Hosting
AWS CodeCommit Integration Guide
AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed Git repository service by AWS. This guide covers setup, authentication, CI/CD integration, and comparisons with other platforms.
- Team leads or developers choosing a Git hosting solution
- Basic Git remote operation knowledge
- Understanding of code hosting requirements
- Comparing only feature lists while ignoring operational costs
- Choosing a self-hosted solution without sufficient maintenance capacity
What you will learn
- Understand the core purpose of AWS CodeCommit Integration Guide
- Master the basic usage and common options of AWS CodeCommit Integration Guide
- AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed Git repository service by AWS. This guide covers setup, authentication, CI/CD integration, and comparisons with other platforms.
- Understand key concepts: Repository Setup
- Know when to use this feature and when to avoid it
Start with a problem
You're choosing or configuring a Git hosting solution — whether self-hosting Gitea or comparing GitHub, GitLab, and Gitee features. You're not sure which option best fits your team's needs.
One-Sentence Understanding
AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed, AWS-native Git service — its biggest difference from GitHub/GitLab is the lack of a web-based PR interface, with all interaction happening through the AWS ecosystem and CLI.
Repository Setup
Create a Repository
aws codecommit create-repository --repository-name my-repo --repository-description "My project"
Clone an empty repository:
git clone codecommit::ap-northeast-1://my-repo
cd my-repo && git add . && git commit -m "Initial commit" && git push
IAM Authentication vs SSH
| Method | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| IAM User + HTTPS | Fine-grained access control | Requires IAM policy setup |
| SSH Keys | Familiar workflow | Key management overhead |
| Git Credentials (HTTPS) | Temporary credentials, no IAM user | Credentials expire hourly |
Example IAM policy:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"codecommit:GitPull",
"codecommit:GitPush"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:codecommit:ap-northeast-1:123456789012:my-repo"
}
]
}
HTTPS Git Credentials
Generate Git credentials in the IAM console, then configure:
git config --global credential.helper '!aws codecommit credential-helper $@'
git config --global credential.UseHttpPath true
HTTPS URLs will now authenticate automatically via the credential helper.
CodePipeline Integration
Use CodeCommit as the source stage in CodePipeline:
# buildspec.yml
version: 0.2
phases:
install:
commands:
- npm install
build:
commands:
- npm run build
artifacts:
files:
- 'dist/**/*'
Pipeline stages:
- Source: CodeCommit repository + branch
- Build: CodeBuild (via buildspec.yml)
- Deploy: ECS / Lambda / S3
Triggers & Notifications
aws codecommit create-trigger \
--repository-name my-repo \
--trigger-configuration name=my-trigger,events=all,destinationArn=arn:aws:sns:ap-northeast-1:123456789012:my-topic
Cross-Account Access
Share repositories across AWS accounts via AWS RAM:
Account A (Owner) → Create repo → Share with Account B
Account B (Collaborator) → Accept share → git clone cross-account
Alternatively, use IAM roles with AssumeRole to pull code across accounts.
Repository Mirroring & Migration
Mirror from GitHub to CodeCommit
git clone --mirror https://github.com/user/repo.git
cd repo.git
git remote add codecommit codecommit::ap-northeast-1://my-repo
git push --mirror codecommit
Use CodeBuild + EventBridge for periodic sync automation.
Migrate from Other Platforms
git clone --mirror <source-url>
cd repo.git
git remote add target <codecommit-url>
git push --mirror target
git lfs fetch --all && git lfs push --all target
Git LFS Support & Limitations
CodeCommit supports Git LFS with the following constraints:
| Feature | Limit |
|---|---|
| Max file size | 5 GB (LFS files) |
| Repository size | Recommended < 10 GB |
| LFS storage | Additional charge (per GB/month) |
| Concurrent pushes | Max 30 |
CodeCommit's LFS is backed by S3, with higher latency than GitHub. Use it primarily for build artifacts and large binaries.
Comparison with GitHub/GitLab
| Dimension | CodeCommit | GitHub | GitLab |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web UI (PR/MR) | No | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD integration | CodePipeline | Actions | GitLab CI |
| Permission model | IAM policy | Org/Team | Role/Group |
| Self-hosted option | No | No | Community Edition |
| Pricing | Pay-per-use | Per-seat + plan | Per-seat + plan |
Try it yourself
- Practice the aws-codecommit command in a test repository and observe state changes before and after
- Experiment with different options and compare the output differences
- Simulate a real scenario where you would need to use this, and walk through the full process
Continue Learning
hosting/platform-comparison— Platform comparisonhosting/gerrit-code-review— Gerrit code review systemgithub/github-flow-basics— GitHub Flow basics